We’re using cookies, but you can turn them off in Privacy Settings.  Otherwise, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Accepting cookies does not mean that we are collecting personal data. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.

view of bridge

The financial sector can play a role in aligning private sector incentives with sustainable development, without incurring additional financial risk or sacrificing returns, but the CSP-credit risk relationship is dependent on country sustainability.


Authors: Dr. Lutfi Abdul Razak, Prof Dr. Mansor H Ibrahim, Dr. Adam Ng

Download PDF

Introduction

Financial markets play an important role in the allocation of capital by attracting funds from investors and channelling them to corporations. In particular, the magnitude and direction of credit is strongly influenced by credit rating agencies (CRAs), which is dominated by three market players: S&P (previously Standard & Poor’s), Moody’s and Fitch. However, the global financial crisis (GFC) of 2008 provides recent evidence that ratings may be affected by systematic errors or biases.

In 2011, the US Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, in its 2011 report, wrote that “the three credit rating agencies were key enablers of the financial meltdown”. In 2013, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) sued S&P for fraudulently inflating ratings on mortgagebacked instruments prior to the financial crisis.The lawsuits were resolved in 2015 with S&P agreeing to pay a US$1.5 billion (RM6.5 billion) settlement fee, which exceeds the profits earned by the company for rating mortgage-backed securities from 2002 to 2007.

More recently, regulatory pressures on CRAs have been building up in Europe, particularly in relation to sustainable finance. In 2018, the EU acknowledged that CRAs are systemically important institutions and their risk assessment methods influence the sustainability and stability of the financial system. While the consideration of non-financial or qualitative information, such as environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria, is not new to credit risk analysis, the systematic analysis of ESG within the framework is. In May 2016, the UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) launched the Statement on ESG in Credit Risk and Ratings for investors and CRAs to publicly state their recognition of the value of considering ESG factors transparently and systematically in credit risk analysis. 

Publisher

CFA Society Malaysia

CFA Society Malaysia is an association of local investment professionals. Consisting of portfolio managers, investment advisors, educators and other financial professionals, promotes:

- ethical and professional standards within the investment industry,
- encourage professional development through the CFA Program and continuing education,
- facilitate the exchange of information and opinions among people within the local investment community and beyond, and;
- work to further the public's understanding of the CFA designation and investment industry.

As one of CFA Institute member societies, CFA Society Malaysia connects members to a global network of investment professionals.

Share on Facebook Share on Weibo Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn