Mid-Year Research Update 2017: Active managers performance, factor-driven, ESG, and fixed income indices

S&P Dow Jones Indices    Craig J. Lazzara, Priscilla Luk, Sunjiv Mainie, Charles Mounts, Aye M. Soe
07 Jul 2017
Categories: Macroeconomics, Fixed Income, Financial Analysis, Investment Management, ESG

Country or region: Asia Pacific (Overall)

Summary:
Published in May 2017, this research reveals most active managers fail most of the time, at least if we define failure as underperformance of an appropriate passive benchmark. Success, when it does occur, tends not to persist.


Reference URL: http://asia.spindices.com/documents/research/research-mid-year-research-update-2017.pdf?force_download=true




Abstract

Even a casual observer of the investment landscape will realize that passive assets under management have grown dramatically, taking share from active managers.2 The reasons for this are well known and well established, and spring from the inherent performance advantages that attend passive management. Both theoretical argument3 and empirical observation4 make it clear that most active managers fail most of the time, and that outperformance, when it occurs, tends not to persist.

What the casual observer might not know is that passive management has itself come to encompass an increasing variety of indices. The earliest generation of index funds was designed to track capitalization-weighted indices that represent an entire asset class—most prominent among them the S&P 500®. A second generation of equity indices reflected subdivisions and extensions of the first generation—subdivisions into sectors and industries, and extensions down the capitalization scale. As with the first generation, the second was designed to replicate the returns of an asset class (a more specialized asset class, granted, but still an asset class), and second-generation indices were also typically capitalization-weighted. In addition, indexing spread from equities to fixed income securities and commodities.

Today most equity index development is focused not on asset class replication but on what we prefer to call factor indexing. 5 Factor indices are designed to give their users exposure to a particular pattern of returns or, more generally, to a quality or attribute with which excess returns have historically been associated.6 S&P DJI’s ongoing research initiatives for 2017 fall squarely within this set of developments, emphasizing:

• Factor/smart beta indices
• ESG (environmental, social, governance) indices
• Fixed income indices



Date of original publication:

05/30/2017


Statistics
Total Views: 2141
Total Downloads: 35

Share Article

Reader Comments

No comments made on this post yet

Note

If you have any copyright and other associated infringements related to this item, please click on the Terms and Conditions link where you will be directed to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA) that will outline the procedure for raising your concern.

If you have any concerns with the content of the item [e.g., offensive language and/or material, inappropriate material] then please proceed to utilize the Contact Us form. Remember that when using the Contact Us form, please ensure you reference/cite clearly the item in question (e.g., name of article, author(s) of article) and the nature of the complaint.

Categories