Multi-asset: What’s in a name?

Maxine Elliott    Penny Ning Pan, Senior Product Manager, FTSE Russell
08 Apr 2019
Categories: Fixed Income, Investment Management, Regulatory changes, Alternative Assets, Equity Investments

Country or region: Asia Pacific (Overall)

Summary:
The terms that are used to describe funds' level of risk, such as conservative, balanced, and aggressive, carry some ambiguity. Can they be replaced by more objective terms based strictly on volatility measures?
Download Article



Abstract

Exactly 25 years ago a British ad campaign for a wood varnish succeeded beyond the wildest dreams of the manufacturer. 

Ronseal’s “It does exactly what it says on the tin” campaign turned the conventional marketing campaign wisdom upside down. Instead of promising extraordinary outcomes, the ads’ mundane promise was: this is what you want, so this is what you get. It junked the jargon and left consumers clear about what they were buying.

Sales rocketed, the campaign slogan became one of the most recalled in history, and “it does exactly what is says on the tin” entered the British English vernacular when describing a person, product or process that delivers. It’s even been adopted by political leaders in much the same way ad slogans like "Where's the beef?" have been deployed by politicians in the US.

The financial services industry tries to take the same approach, offering products that deliver as the buyer hoped. But one area where there is still some ambiguity is in the terminology used to define risk tolerance levels.

Terms like “conservative,” “balanced” and “aggressive” are commonly used to define different risk tolerance levels in multi-asset investment products or indexes, but without objective data to back up these definitions. 

The risks of this ambiguity are clear: investors may realize too late that an index or product they have selected is far from their own expectation of the level of risk tolerance the name seemed to imply. In investments, as in other spheres of life, what seems “moderate” through one pair of eyes can be “conservative” in another’s. 




Statistics
Total Views: 1463
Total Downloads: 51

Share Article

Reader Comments

No comments made on this post yet

Note

If you have any copyright and other associated infringements related to this item, please click on the Terms and Conditions link where you will be directed to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA) that will outline the procedure for raising your concern.

If you have any concerns with the content of the item [e.g., offensive language and/or material, inappropriate material] then please proceed to utilize the Contact Us form. Remember that when using the Contact Us form, please ensure you reference/cite clearly the item in question (e.g., name of article, author(s) of article) and the nature of the complaint.

Categories