SPIVA® Australia Mid-Year 2018 Scorecard 

Categories: General Market Analysis, Fixed Income, Investment Management, Investor Education, Equity Investments

Country or region: Australia

Summary:
The SPIVA Australia Scorecard reports on the performance of actively managed Australian mutual funds against their respective benchmark indices over 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year investment horizons.


Reference URL: https://spindices.com/documents/spiva/spiva-australia-mid-year-2018.pdf




Abstract

S&P Dow Jones Indices has been the de facto scorekeeper of the ongoing active versus passive debate since the first publication of the SPIVA U.S. Scorecard in 2002. Over the years, we have built on our 16 years of experience publishing the report by expanding scorecard coverage into Australia, Canada, Europe, India, Japan, Latin America, and South Africa. 

The SPIVA Australia Scorecard reports on the performance of actively managed Australian mutual funds against their respective benchmark indices over 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year investment horizons. 1 In this scorecard, we evaluated returns of more than 849 Australian equity funds (large, mid, and small cap, as well as A-REIT), 425 international equity funds, and 116 Australian bond funds.

In the one-year period ending June 30, 2018, the majority of Australian funds in most categories underperformed their respective benchmarks, apart from the Australian mid- and small-cap category. However, the yearly active versus index figures varied across market cycles without consistent trends.

We have consistently observed that the majority of Australian active funds in most categories fail to beat their comparable benchmark indices over the long term. Over the 10-year period ending June 30, 2018, almost 90% of international equity funds and more than 70% of Australian equity general, Australian bond, and A-REIT funds underperformed their respective benchmarks on an absolute basis. In contrast, more than half of Australian small-cap funds beat their benchmarks.

Observations based on risk-adjusted returns were similar for most categories, with the result for the Australian bond and A-REIT funds being more favorable across various measured periods.



Date of original publication:

09/10/2018


Statistics
Total Views: 346
Total Downloads: 2

Share Article

Reader Comments

No comments made on this post yet

Note

If you have any copyright and other associated infringements related to this item, please click on the Terms and Conditions link where you will be directed to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA) that will outline the procedure for raising your concern.

If you have any concerns with the content of the item [e.g., offensive language and/or material, inappropriate material] then please proceed to utilize the Contact Us form. Remember that when using the Contact Us form, please ensure you reference/cite clearly the item in question (e.g., name of article, author(s) of article) and the nature of the complaint.

Categories