Smart beta survey of asset owners

Maxine Elliott    Rolf Agather, managing director of research, North America, FTSE Russell
20 Jun 2019
Categories: General Market Analysis, Investment Management, ESG, Investor Education, Equity Investments

Country or region: Asia Pacific (Overall)

A summary of key findings from FTSE Russell's latest annual global survey of smart beta usage by asset owners with a collective AUM of over $5 trillion suggests that smart beta is now a standard tool in investors’ armories.


The findings of our latest annual global survey of smart beta usage by asset owners (with a collective AUM of over $5 trillion), suggests that smart beta is now a standard tool in investors’ armories.

For the first time, we found that the majority of asset owners—government organizations, corporations, unions, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds and family offices from North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and elsewhere—now allocate to smart beta.
Here are five key findings from the report. (Download the report here - [link to :

1. Asset owners in the survey not deploying smart beta are now in the minority
Global adoption of smart beta has doubled in four years. Fifty-eight percent of asset owners now have an allocation to a smart beta strategy, compared to 26 percent in 2015, when a downturn in adoption compared with our first survey a year earlier appeared to suggest that the strategy might fail to take off. Since then, adoption of smart beta has risen consistently. Geographically, nearly two-thirds (65 percent) of European asset owners now have a smart beta exposure, versus 60 percent in North America. In our first survey back in 2014, only 42 percent of European respondents had adopted smart beta, and less than one third (32 percent) of North American respondents had adopted.
An attitudinal watershed also appears to have been reached: only six percent of asset owners had recently evaluated and then rejected smart beta strategies, compared with nearly one quarter (23 percent) in 2015.

2. Investors are combining ESG and smart beta, but growth is not uniform
Three years ago, we started asking questions about applying ESG considerations to smart beta strategies. Interest is rising among those respondents who are using or evaluating smart beta, and 44 percent said they anticipate applying ESG considerations to their smart beta strategy.
We’ve again seen a growth in appetite for Smart Sustainability—combining sustainability parameters and risk premia, for example, via factor exposure, within a single index solution. This reflects the growing demand for the incorporation of both factors and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data into investment tools, including indexes.
But there are pronounced regional differences in the responses, most notably between respondents based in Europe and North America. For European survey respondents who either had an existing or anticipated smart beta allocation, 77% said they might incorporate ESG considerations into that allocation. However, only 17 percent of North American survey respondents with an existing or anticipated future smart beta allocation gave the same response.

3. The appetite for multi-factor strategies is rising  
In our first survey of 2014, multi-factor strategies were so new, they didn’t even feature. Now they account for the highest number of new smart beta adoptions. There has been an adoption surge in the last year: less than half (49 percent) of respondents were using multi-factor strategies in 2018, compared to 71 percent this time round. For the first time new smart beta users were more likely to choose a multi-factor approach than any other. This adoption rate is even more apparent when we look at the North American asset owners’ experience. Our data shows that usage there now stands at 80 percent.

4. Size is no longer a deterrent
Smaller asset owners are also embracing smart beta. In our inaugural survey six years ago, the largest asset owners were five times more likely to have adopted smart beta strategies than those with AUM less than $1B. In that year, fewer than one in 10 small asset owners were users of smart beta strategies: now 46 percent are users. But the adoption gap has narrowed in the years since, and the greatest change in adoption rates has taken place in the under $1B tier.

5. Fixed income: mind the gap 
The pattern of adoption of smart beta strategies might replicate the path of passive investment adoption, where fixed income passive fund growth only followed in the wake of the rise of passive equity AUM. But that is by no means a given, and the important questions investors raised in the survey would need to be addressed first.
Overall, fixed income smart beta adoption rates have risen but are still minimal by comparison, and we found that there is no one single barrier to entry. This suggests a general unfamiliarity with the strategy, rather than a specific hurdle. Lack of resource, enduring faith in active, lack of product, and the absence of consultant support were all cited as reasons for having not yet adopted fixed income smart beta strategies.

Overall, it now seems unequivocal that investors have truly embraced smart beta, and skepticism that it would remain niche have faded. But investors are still asking detailed questions about its use beyond equities, and in particular, in conjunction with ESG strategies.

*For the purposes of the survey we defined “smart beta” as an investment strategy that applied an index-based approach that is not traditionally market cap-weighted.

Date of original publication:


Total Views: 116
Total Downloads: 0

Share Article

Reader Comments

No comments made on this post yet


If you have any copyright and other associated infringements related to this item, please click on the Terms and Conditions link where you will be directed to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA) that will outline the procedure for raising your concern.

If you have any concerns with the content of the item [e.g., offensive language and/or material, inappropriate material] then please proceed to utilize the Contact Us form. Remember that when using the Contact Us form, please ensure you reference/cite clearly the item in question (e.g., name of article, author(s) of article) and the nature of the complaint.